Detailed scoring criteria

Data: GIS data representing an aggregation of community comments from Maptionnaire survey, walk audits, other community events, and Mountain View’s online and 311 community comment portals

• 0Project area has low density of community comments (lower third)
• 4Project area has medium density of community comments (middle third)
• 9Project area has high density of community comments (top third)

Data: GIS crash data analysis from Mountain View Local Road Safety Plan

• 0Project area has no or low density of fatal or severe injury crashes (bottom third)
• 7Project area has medium density of fatal or severe injury crashes (middle third)
• 14Project area has a relatively high density of fatal or severe injury crashes (top third)

Data: Mountain View GIS data measuring the distance between pedestrian crossing opportunities

• 0Project does not reduce pedestrian block length at all
• 2Project reduces pedestrian block length but not to less than 500’
• 4Project reduces pedestrian block length to less than 500’

Data: Mountain View GIS data measuring the width of pedestrian crossing distance at intersections

• 0Project does not decrease width of pedestrian crossing distance
• 5Project does decrease width of pedestrian crossing distance

Data: U.S. Census data

• 0Project is not within a low- or low- to mid-income census tract
• 7Project is within a low- to mid-income census tract defined as having more than 14% of the population below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL).
• 14Project is within a low-income census tract defined as having more than 28% of the population below 200% of FPL.

Data: City of Mountain View GIS data

• 0Project does not close a sidewalk gap
• 3Project partially closes a sidewalk gap
• 6.5Project does close a sidewalk gap

Data: City of Mountain View GIS data

• 0Project does not close a gap in the AAA bicycle network
• 3Project partially closes a gap in the AAA bicycle network
• 6.5Project does close a gap in the AAA bicycle network

Data: Mountain View GIS data of all school locations

• 0Project is more than 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) from a school (public or private)
• 4Project is less than 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) from a school or on a suggested route to school (public or private)
• 9Project fronts a school (public or private)

Data: Mountain View GIS data of key destinations

Key destinations include: commercial center, park, trail, senior center, or senior living community

• 0Project is more than 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) from a key destination
• 4Project is less than 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) from a key destination
• 9Project fronts a key destination

Data: Mountain View GIS data of all transit stops

• 0Project is not within 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) of any transit stop (bus or rail)
• 2Project is within 5-minute walk (0.25 mile) of any transit stop (bus or rail)
• 4Project is within 10-minute walk (0.5 mile) of major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (bus or rail)

Data: Previous Mountain View project unit costs

• 0$$$ (> $10M)
• 1$$ ($2M – $10M)
• 2$ (< $2M)

Data: Assessment of agency jurisdictions and departmental responsibilities

• 0City and 2 or more additional outside agencies
• 1City and 1 additional outside agency
• 2None, only city departments

Data: Mountain View staff professional judgment

• 0Long
• 1Medium
• 2Short

Data: Mountain View staff professional judgment

• 0No
• 2Yes

Data: Mountain View staff and consultant professional judgement

• 0No
• 2Yes

Data: Mountain View satellite imagery and GIS data

• 0Project does not reduce impervious surface area
• 2Project reduces impervious surface area by less than 4%
• 4.5Project reduces impervious surface area by 4% or more

Data: Mountain View satellite imagery and GIS data

• 0Project does not increase open space for plantings (per typical)
• 2Project provides enough space for ground cover plantings (plantable spaces < 5’ wide)
• 4.5Project provides enough space for ground cover plantings and shade trees (plantable spaces ≥ 5’ wide)